What treatment outcomes matter in adolescent depression? A Q-study of priority profiles among mental health practitioners in the UK and Chile

Karolin Rose Krause*, Ana Calderón, Victor Gomez Pino, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Bettina Moltrecht, Miranda Wolpert

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

Evidence-based and person-centred care requires the measurement of treatment outcomes that matter to youth and mental health practitioners. Priorities, however, may vary not just between but also within stakeholder groups. This study used Q-methodology to explore differences in outcome priorities among mental health practitioners from two countries in relation to youth depression. Practitioners from the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 27) and Chile (n = 15) sorted 35 outcome descriptions by importance and completed brief semi-structured interviews about their sorting rationale. By-person principal component analysis (PCA) served to identify distinct priority profiles within each country sample; second-order PCA examined whether these profiles could be further reduced into cross-cultural “super profiles”. We identified three UK outcome priority profiles (Reduced symptoms and enhanced well-being; improved individual coping and self-management; improved family coping and support), and two Chilean profiles (Strengthened identity and enhanced insight; symptom reduction and self-management). These could be further reduced into two cross-cultural super profiles: one prioritized outcomes related to reduced depressive symptoms and enhanced well-being; the other prioritized outcomes related to improved resilience resources within youth and families. A practitioner focus on symptom reduction aligns with a long-standing focus on symptomatic change in youth depression treatment studies, and with recent measurement recommendations. Less data and guidance are available to those practitioners who prioritize resilience outcomes. To raise the chances that such practitioners will engage in evidence-based practice and measurement-based care, measurement guidance for a broader set of outcomes may be needed.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)151-166
Número de páginas16
PublicaciónEuropean Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volumen33
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2023

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

  • Pediatría, perinaltología y salud infantil
  • Psicología educativa y evolutiva
  • Psiquiatría y salud mental

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'What treatment outcomes matter in adolescent depression? A Q-study of priority profiles among mental health practitioners in the UK and Chile'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto