TY - JOUR
T1 - Supervised machine learning-based multi-class phase prediction in high-entropy alloys using robust databases
AU - Oñate, Angelo
AU - Sanhueza, Juan Pablo
AU - Zegpi, Diabb
AU - Tuninetti, Víctor
AU - Ramirez, Jesús
AU - Medina, Carlos
AU - Melendrez, Manuel
AU - Rojas, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/11/5
Y1 - 2023/11/5
N2 - This work evaluated the phase prediction capability of high entropy alloys using four supervised machine learning models K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multinomial Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest. The study addresses the challenge of predicting multicomponent alloys by considering the overlapping of multicategorical stability parameters. Eight prediction classes (FCC, BCC, FCC+BCC, FCC+Im, BCC+Im, FCC+BCC+Im, Im and AM) were used. Finally, the predicted results were compared with those of two new alloys fabricated by induction melting in a controlled atmosphere using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results indicate that with a robust database, appropriate data treatment, and training, satisfactory and competitive prediction indicators can be obtained with traditional machine learning predictions based on four prediction classes: Solid Solution (SS), Solid Solution with Intermetallic (SS+Im), intermetallic (Im), and amorphous (AM). The best predictive model obtained from the four evaluated models was Random Forest, with an accuracy of 72.8% and ROC AUC of 93.1%.
AB - This work evaluated the phase prediction capability of high entropy alloys using four supervised machine learning models K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Multinomial Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest. The study addresses the challenge of predicting multicomponent alloys by considering the overlapping of multicategorical stability parameters. Eight prediction classes (FCC, BCC, FCC+BCC, FCC+Im, BCC+Im, FCC+BCC+Im, Im and AM) were used. Finally, the predicted results were compared with those of two new alloys fabricated by induction melting in a controlled atmosphere using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results indicate that with a robust database, appropriate data treatment, and training, satisfactory and competitive prediction indicators can be obtained with traditional machine learning predictions based on four prediction classes: Solid Solution (SS), Solid Solution with Intermetallic (SS+Im), intermetallic (Im), and amorphous (AM). The best predictive model obtained from the four evaluated models was Random Forest, with an accuracy of 72.8% and ROC AUC of 93.1%.
KW - High entropy alloys
KW - Intermetallics prediction
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Phase prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164304117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171224
DO - 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171224
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164304117
SN - 0925-8388
VL - 962
JO - Journal of Alloys and Compounds
JF - Journal of Alloys and Compounds
M1 - 171224
ER -