Association between the Anatomical Location of Glioblastoma and Its Evaluation with Clinical Considerations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Título traducido de la contribución: Asociación entre la Ubicación Anatómica del Glioblastoma y su Evaluación con Consideraciones Clínicas: Una Revisión Sistemática y Metaanálisis

Juan Jose Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Laura Moyano-Valarezo, Vicente Silva-Bravo, Daniel Milos-Brandenberg, Mathias Orellana-Donoso, Pablo Nova-Baeza, Alejandra Suazo-Santibáñez, Macarena Rodríguez-Luengo, Gustavo Oyanedel-Amaro, Juan Sanchis-Gimeno, Héctor Gutiérrez Espinoza*

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Glioblastoma is a primary malignant brain tumor; it is aggressive with a high degree of malignancy and unfavorable prognosis and is the most common type of malignant brain tumor. Glioblastomas can be located in the brain, cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord, originating from glial cells, particularly astrocytes. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were researched up to January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was evaluated with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). The statistical mean, standard deviation, and difference of means calculated with the Student's t-test for presence between hemispheres and presence in the frontal and temporal lobes were analyzed. Results: A total of 123 studies met the established selection criteria, with a total of 6224 patients. In relation to the mean, GBM between hemispheres had a mean of 33.36 (SD 58.00) in the right hemisphere and a mean of 34.70 (SD 65.07) in the left hemisphere, due to the difference in averages between hemispheres. There were no statistically significant differences, p = 0.35. For the comparison between the presence of GBM in the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was a mean in the frontal lobe of 23.23 (SD 40.03), while in the temporal lobe, the mean was 22.05 (SD 43.50), and for the difference in means between the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was no statistically significant difference for the presence of GBM, p = 0.178. Conclusions: We believe that before a treatment, it will always be correct to know where the GBM is located and how it behaves clinically, in order to generate correct conservative or surgical treatment guidelines for each patient. We believe that more detailed studies are also needed to show why GBM is associated more with some regions than others, despite the brain structure being homologous to other regions in which GMB occurs less frequently, which is why knowing its predominant presence in brain regions is very important.
Título traducido de la contribuciónAsociación entre la Ubicación Anatómica del Glioblastoma y su Evaluación con Consideraciones Clínicas: Una Revisión Sistemática y Metaanálisis
Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo3460
Páginas (desde-hasta)2
Número de páginas61
PublicaciónJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volumen13
N.º12
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2024

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Asociación entre la Ubicación Anatómica del Glioblastoma y su Evaluación con Consideraciones Clínicas: Una Revisión Sistemática y Metaanálisis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto