TY - JOUR
T1 - Wound contraction rate in excised and unexcised burn wounds with laser photobiomodulation
T2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
AU - Deana, Naira Figueiredo
AU - Zaror, Carlos
AU - del Sol, Mariano
AU - Bagnato, Vanderlei Salvador
AU - Alves, Nilton
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Introduction: Laser photobiomodulation (laser PBM) is an effective means of accelerating burn wound contraction, however it is still unclear whether laser PBM produces greater benefit when applied directly to excised and unexcised burn wounds. The aim of this systematic review of preclinical studies was to determine the effectiveness of laser PBM in the wound contraction rate in excised and unexcised burn wounds. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in the EMBASE, MEDLINE and LILACS databases. Preclinical studies were included that analysed the effectiveness of laser PBM in burn wound contraction, and assessed wound closure. The SYRCLE risk of bias tool was used. Random effects models were used to estimate the pooled effect. Results: Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and six in the quantitative analysis. Two weeks after the lesion, laser PBM favoured the wound contraction percentage, increasing the closure rate in excised burn wounds (SMD= 1.34, CI 95% 0.41 to 2.27, 0.41–2.27, I2=0%, = 0%, low certainty of evidence. In unexcised burns, it was uncertain whether laser PBM increased or diminished the wound contraction rate (SMD=1.22(SMD = 1.22 CI 95% −0.05 to 2.49, I2=68%; = 68%; very low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: In the animal model, laser PBM is effective in increasing the wound contraction rate in excised burns. However, due to the low certainty of the evidence, uncertainty remains about the true magnitude of the effect of laser on wound contraction in animals; our results should therefore be interpreted with caution.
AB - Introduction: Laser photobiomodulation (laser PBM) is an effective means of accelerating burn wound contraction, however it is still unclear whether laser PBM produces greater benefit when applied directly to excised and unexcised burn wounds. The aim of this systematic review of preclinical studies was to determine the effectiveness of laser PBM in the wound contraction rate in excised and unexcised burn wounds. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in the EMBASE, MEDLINE and LILACS databases. Preclinical studies were included that analysed the effectiveness of laser PBM in burn wound contraction, and assessed wound closure. The SYRCLE risk of bias tool was used. Random effects models were used to estimate the pooled effect. Results: Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and six in the quantitative analysis. Two weeks after the lesion, laser PBM favoured the wound contraction percentage, increasing the closure rate in excised burn wounds (SMD= 1.34, CI 95% 0.41 to 2.27, 0.41–2.27, I2=0%, = 0%, low certainty of evidence. In unexcised burns, it was uncertain whether laser PBM increased or diminished the wound contraction rate (SMD=1.22(SMD = 1.22 CI 95% −0.05 to 2.49, I2=68%; = 68%; very low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: In the animal model, laser PBM is effective in increasing the wound contraction rate in excised burns. However, due to the low certainty of the evidence, uncertainty remains about the true magnitude of the effect of laser on wound contraction in animals; our results should therefore be interpreted with caution.
KW - Animal model
KW - Burn
KW - Debridement
KW - Laser photobiomodulation
KW - Wound contraction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134782399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35842272
AN - SCOPUS:85134782399
SN - 0305-4179
VL - 49
SP - 261
EP - 274
JO - Burns
JF - Burns
IS - 2
ER -