Determining and reflective judgments: Two Approaches to understanding legal Decisions

Diego Pérez Lasserre

doi:10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02

Determining and reflective judgments: Two Approaches to understanding legal Decisions

Diego Pérez Lasserre^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

this article examines legal judgments in light of the two ways that, according to Kant, the Power of Judgment operates. After analyzing both uses of this faculty, it justifies that legal decisions can be considered as a type of reflective judgments, but not as exemplary as the ones treated in the Critique of the Power of Judgment—namely, the aesthetic and teleological.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	23-41
Number of pages	19
Journal	Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
Volume	7
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02
State	Published - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Estonian Association for the History and Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

History
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02

Cite this

@article{27de17c3d2f84e8e8bda236b029f5c48,

title = "Determining and reflective judgments: Two Approaches to understanding legal Decisions",

abstract = "this article examines legal judgments in light of the two ways that, according to Kant, the Power of Judgment operates. After analyzing both uses of this faculty, it justifies that legal decisions can be considered as a type of reflective judgments, but not as exemplary as the ones treated in the Critique of the Power of Judgment—namely, the aesthetic and teleological.",

keywords = "Determining judgments, Kant, Legal decisions, Reflective judgments",

author = "Lasserre, {Diego P{\'e}rez}",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

pages = "23--41",

journal = "Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum",

issn = "2228-2009",

publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining and reflective judgments

T2 - Two Approaches to understanding legal Decisions

AU - Lasserre, Diego Pérez

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - this article examines legal judgments in light of the two ways that, according to Kant, the Power of Judgment operates. After analyzing both uses of this faculty, it justifies that legal decisions can be considered as a type of reflective judgments, but not as exemplary as the ones treated in the Critique of the Power of Judgment—namely, the aesthetic and teleological.

AB - this article examines legal judgments in light of the two ways that, according to Kant, the Power of Judgment operates. After analyzing both uses of this faculty, it justifies that legal decisions can be considered as a type of reflective judgments, but not as exemplary as the ones treated in the Critique of the Power of Judgment—namely, the aesthetic and teleological.

KW - Determining judgments

KW - Kant

KW - Legal decisions

KW - Reflective judgments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080082549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02

DO - 10.11590/abhps.2019.3.02

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85080082549

SN - 2228-2009

VL - 7

SP - 23

EP - 41

JO - Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum

JF - Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum

IS - 3

ER -

Determining and reflective judgments: Two Approaches to understanding legal Decisions

Abstract

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this