Del romanticismo erudito al juicio científico: Balance bibliográfico de los estudios sobre Fernando de Córdoba

Translated title of the contribution: From erudite romanticism to scientific judgment: Bibliographical balance of the scholarship on Fernando de Córdoba

Miguel Saralegui*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Fernando de Córdoba is one of the greatest Spanish philosophers of the XVth century. Because of the academical neglection of this philosopher, only exists one modern edition of his works and no translation to Spanish of his books originally written in latin. The signification of his thought-he was the first to participate in the Aristotle-Plato controversy, being the first to deffend Plato in laudibus Platonis-demands to fill this absense of studies. As a preliminary step, this article studies the trend of bibliographical scholarship since it was born one hundred and fifty years ago. Most of these studies offer a prejudicial view of Cordoba, normally including him in more polemical debates, such as the one of the existence of Spanish Philosophy. The object of this article is to offer a guide to those who want to pursue in the study of Fernando de Córdoba, informing about which works could serve for the more elaborate research and which should be discarded.

Translated title of the contributionFrom erudite romanticism to scientific judgment: Bibliographical balance of the scholarship on Fernando de Córdoba
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)93-125
Number of pages33
JournalAnales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From erudite romanticism to scientific judgment: Bibliographical balance of the scholarship on Fernando de Córdoba'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this