TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparación entre el auto-reporte de actividad física y la medición con acelerómetro según factores sociodemográficos
AU - Grupo de Investigación ELHOC
AU - Labraña, Ana María
AU - Ramírez-Alarcón, Karina
AU - Salas-Bravo, Carlos
AU - Garrido-Méndez, Alex
AU - Matus-Castillo, Carlos
AU - Diaz-Martinez, Ximena
AU - Concha-Cisternas, Yeny
AU - Martínez-Sanguinetti, María Adela
AU - Leiva, Ana María
AU - Luarte, Cristian
AU - Petermann-Rocha, Fanny
AU - Celis-Morales, Carlos
AU - Martorell Pons, Miquel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Sociedad Chilena de Nutricion Bromatologia y Toxilogica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Introduction: Determining level of physical activity (PA) can be done with objective measurement, through accele-rometer, or by subjective measurement through self-report questionnaire. The aim of this study was to compare PA measurements derived from a self-reported questionnaire and accelerometer according to sociodemographic factors in the Chilean population. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study which included 230 Chilean adults participating in the GENADIO study (Genes, Environment, Diabetes and Obesity). PA levels were measured through the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and GT1M accele-rometer (ActiTrainer, ActiGraph). Results: IPAQ questionnaire underestimated the total PA levels compared to the accelerometer measurement (delta[IPAQ-Acel.]=-55.7 min/ day). According to educational level, IPAQ questionnaire overestimated PA level in people with low educational level (delta[IPAQ-Accel.]= 70.4 min/day), but underestimated total PA in people with secondary education or university technician (delta[IPAQ-Accel.]=-67.9 and-135.6 min/day, respectively). Similar results were observed for the different levels of socioeconomic income. Conclusion: The IPAQ questionnaire underestimated total PA levels compared to accelerometer; however, these differences varied according to sociodemographic factors.
AB - Introduction: Determining level of physical activity (PA) can be done with objective measurement, through accele-rometer, or by subjective measurement through self-report questionnaire. The aim of this study was to compare PA measurements derived from a self-reported questionnaire and accelerometer according to sociodemographic factors in the Chilean population. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study which included 230 Chilean adults participating in the GENADIO study (Genes, Environment, Diabetes and Obesity). PA levels were measured through the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and GT1M accele-rometer (ActiTrainer, ActiGraph). Results: IPAQ questionnaire underestimated the total PA levels compared to the accelerometer measurement (delta[IPAQ-Acel.]=-55.7 min/ day). According to educational level, IPAQ questionnaire overestimated PA level in people with low educational level (delta[IPAQ-Accel.]= 70.4 min/day), but underestimated total PA in people with secondary education or university technician (delta[IPAQ-Accel.]=-67.9 and-135.6 min/day, respectively). Similar results were observed for the different levels of socioeconomic income. Conclusion: The IPAQ questionnaire underestimated total PA levels compared to accelerometer; however, these differences varied according to sociodemographic factors.
KW - Accelerometer
KW - Education
KW - IPAQ
KW - Physical activity
KW - Sociodemographic factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090693311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4067/S0717-75182020000400620
DO - 10.4067/S0717-75182020000400620
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090693311
SN - 0717-7518
VL - 47
SP - 620
EP - 629
JO - Revista Chilena de Nutricion
JF - Revista Chilena de Nutricion
IS - 4
ER -