A comparison of mixed logit and latent class models to estimate market segments for seafood faced with ocean acidification

Nelyda Campos-Requena, Felipe Vásquez-Lavin*, Francisco Fernández, Manuel Barrientos, Stefan Gelcich, Roberto D.Ponce Oliva

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study uses a choice experiment to characterize market segments (consumer preferences heterogeneity) based on three attributes of seafood (mussels) that are affected by ocean acidification: shell appearance, meat color, and nutritional composition. Using a sample of 1,257 individuals from two main cities in Chile, we estimate both the Mixed Logit model and the Latent Class model. We use the individual-specific posterior (ISP) parameters’ distribution to categorize consumers’ heterogeneity based on the signs and intensity (i.e., like or dislike dimension) of these ISPs. We compare the pattern of preferences and whether people are classified within the same preference pattern in both models. In general, we observed that the models identify a different number of segments with various patterns of preferences. Moreover, the models classify the same people into different groups. Since the segmentation is sensitive to the chosen model, we discuss strengths, inconsistencies, biases, and best practices regarding methodological approaches to establishing market segments in choice experiments and future ocean acidification conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-314
Number of pages33
JournalAquaculture, Economics and Management
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of mixed logit and latent class models to estimate market segments for seafood faced with ocean acidification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this